Monday, June 06, 2005
Utah’s "de facto" government
ZACHARY D. SHAW #8999
Assistant Attorney General
MARK L. SHURTLEFF # 4666
Attorney General
Attorneys for Respondents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Case No. 20050475-SC
"The Court held that under the de facto doctrine, the acts of one who assumes official authority and exercises duties under color of avalid appointment or election are valid where the community acquiesces to his authority."
More here
ZACHARY D. SHAW #8999
Assistant Attorney General
MARK L. SHURTLEFF # 4666
Attorney General
Attorneys for Respondents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Case No. 20050475-SC
"The Court held that under the de facto doctrine, the acts of one who assumes official authority and exercises duties under color of avalid appointment or election are valid where the community acquiesces to his authority."
More here
Comments:
Post a Comment