Thursday, July 07, 2005
1 the act of terrorizing; use of force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate, esp. such use as a political weapon or policy
2 the demoralization and intimidation produced in this way
Can George W. Bush, quilty of treason and other offenses against the American people and the U.S. Constitution, be as a practical matter, subject to Impeachment in the midst of the London bombings furor?
Will the common folk in England be understanding of possible expected details of a high-level inside job, orchestrated by the Secret Political Police for and on behalf of the British Monarchy?
Can the U.S. and the U.K. avoid martial law hysteria whipped up by the Aristocracy to cancel the U.S. Constitution and the unwritten British "Constitution"?
Do you have any ideas to aid and assist independent bloggers, condemned by the Establishment as being merely "Junkyard Dogs", for fighting off the BIG LIE as to the true nature of the London bombings?
Is the only remedy now to consider the possibility of chopping off the heads of the Anglo-American Aristocracy for these brazen, barbaric crimes done to consolidate their power?
al-Qu’eda or al-a’diversion?
And given Osama bin Laden‘s proven connection to the CIA as a paid ‘asset’ for at least ten years prior to 9/11 coupled to the fact even after years of chasing him up hill and down dale without so much as a sighting, it’s pretty obvious that the US have no intention of actually catching the bugger.
Instead, we get handed a new bogeyman in the form of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who predictably proves to be as elusive as the fabled Osama. Is it just me, or do I see a pattern here?
And with hundreds arrested under anti-terror laws but not a single conviction of anyone actually proved as being a member of al-Qu’eda or even being caught red-handed with a bomb, it’s safe to assume that it’s unlikely that al-Qu’eda actually exists as an effective organisation, let alone operates an ‘international terror network’.
The media for its part is of course doing its bit to keep ramming home the ‘al-Qu’eda' connection even though not a shred of evidence has ever been produced in or out of a court of law to show that it exists, let alone that’s it‘s behind any of the bombings. The name is merely a mantra, like ‘Red’ or ‘Commie’, a convenient button to be pushed as and when needed.
Today’s blasts have been claimed by yet another, previously unknown ‘Islamist’ organisation. The bottom line is that as long the state defines the terrain of struggle – the war on terror – the losers will be us, punters on the way to work and the poor of the planet who dare defy the imperium. [William Bowles]
The Phony (Mossad)Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine [WRH]
Brit Hume Goes On TV & Says He Wants to Profit Off the Terrorist Attack
"My first thought when I heard - just on a personal basis, when I heard there had been this attack and I saw the futures this morning, which were really in the tank, I thought, 'Hmmm, time to buy.'" - Fox News's Brit Hume, 7/7/05 [Huffington Post]
“No confidence” is all that’s left
Though the world must wait for some modicum of reason to be reinstalled at 1600 Pennsylvania venue, it can be done at 10 Downing Street now. The geopolitical plague of Bush II waits to be washed clean.
Only then can we get on with actually confronting the plague of terrorism -- not with a swagger and a self-defeating, terrorist-recruiting occupation, but an honest-to-God plan. To do that that, honest leaders need apply. [pmcarpenter]